Something I had never considered when thinking of different subject areas of study are how diverse different researchers needs and interest could be in one discipline. There are a large number of nursing and public health students who frequently contact the reference desk for help. Between the two groups, they primarily use PubMed, CINAHL, and Medline. Dalton and Charnigo's study finds that of a wide variety of history electronic databases, only four are used by more than 10% of the study population. Perhaps both because history is such a spread out discipline, over time and place, and the nature of historical resources, in that digitizing them is expensive and time consuming, it is difficult to present these resources in universally appealing databases. Historical societies, archives, and museums take on a much larger role in historical research, I think, than in other disciplines, and maybe for similar reasons are the sources used by historians more varied.
It is interesting to me how wide reaching historians' study can be. The Royal Society's library is a portal to the history of science and medicine. Most college freshman would probably not include the study of medicine and science in their description of history. I probably would not have either! But anybody is likely to be a historian on something. And any museum or collection is preserving some history. It is just up to people themselves to make these connections and discover new meanings from the record we have preserved.
Looking through Kent's LibGuide, I'm actually surprised that I don't get more questions about these resources. I do not know if it is because people generally know how to use them, but anytime I get questions about research related to history, the patrons usually seem to be more interested in books (as reported by Dalton and Charnigo). I do not believe I have ever fielded a question by a history faculty member (of which 2% in the study said they consult librarians for help). A resource I have enjoyed in my own time is Chronicling America, which I'm assuming was down throughout the shutdown. It is weird to think how this discipline's access to information can be regulated by government; if the government controls access to the past through its archives, it can, if it wishes, withhold information which will change historians' understanding of the past (and present).
I think that librarians suffer from an image that makes them slightly unapproachable. As the study indicated, few historians utilize the librarian as a resource and even your experience indicates the librarian is not a top source for historians seeking information. Before returning to school for my MLIS, I truly thought the job of the librarian was to manage the information within the library. I never thought it was his or her responsibility to help me access this information. I spent so much time looking for information when I simply could have asked. We must do a better job of marketing ourselves as the ones to ask when one has an information need. This takes us back to the first week's readings and the liaison role of the librarian. Imagine how many resources are not being utilized because no one is asking.
ReplyDelete