The job of the librarian, of course, is to understand the nuances of their patrons information needs and wants; it may be more important to understand how people are going to perceive communication studies rather than to concern yourself defining it. However, Popoff's study is interesting in how different institutions define core collections. There is little consensus over what constitutes the core body of literature in communication; what are libraries and librarians to do? In consulting lists, there is little risk in consulting multiple lists; a collection development librarian can make their own decisions on what makes up a necessary communication collection based on need. However, the implications of disagreement between proprietary indexes are large. Discovery through the databases will be limited by what each index has deemed "core". As cost is ever an issue, most libraries will have to make decisions on what index to purchase and subscribe to. These sorts of issues must be navigated through communication with scholars and faculty, to determine what is best for the departments, faculty, and students.
The Communications databases that Kent offers provide a range of resources to researchers. The standard EbscoHOST journal index is available through Communication and Mass Media complete, which fully indexes over 620 publications, and provides full text to many of these. A full list is available here.
In addition to scholarly research, the University provides several news databases in the form of Factiva, America's News Magazines, LexisNexis, and Newspaper Source. LexisNexis and Factiva have always bothered me in that it is difficult to browse the sources. In Ebsco databases, it is easy to navigate to an issue of your choice publication and scan the article titles. In these databases, I have not found a similar way to do this. It makes it difficult to research news coverage of specific events and overall these user interfaces are unsatisfactory to me. The SRDS Media Solutions database was really interesting to me, even though some of its functionality was limited at the time. This is a much more "practical" database which stores data rather than research.
Citizen Journalism is something that librarians should take a special interest in; our whole doctrine revolves around free access to information, as well as freedom of speech. The internet has increased our freedom to access and speech by leaps and bounds in both its technological capabilities, and its impact on culture. We take for granted that it is so easy to share our opinions and thoughts on the web that we forget it was not always so easy to do this. Citizen journalism is important in that it empowers individuals to report the world as they see it; the internet facilitates this by providing an outlet. However, citizen journalism is also fascinating from the academic standpoint. Just search "citizen journalism" in Communication and Mass Media Complete and you will get 400 some articles. It is changing the way people perceive and interact with "the news" and information. Anyone can be a journalist.